Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Nam, Hyung Seoka; b; c | Han, Manyongd | Choi, Hyung Yund | Song, Kyumane | Kang, Seonggyuf | Ahn, Sung Minf | Lee, Shi-Ukb; c; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea | [b] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea | [c] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea | [d] Department of Mechanical and System Design Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea | [e] School of Architecture, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea | [f] Hyundai Motors Namyang R&D Division, Hwaseong-si, Korea
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Shi-Uk Lee, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07061, Korea. Tel.: +82 28702671; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Optimal seatback angles for automobile drivers’ seats have been investigated based on comfort and back muscle activities; however, radiology supported evidences are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate optimal range of the seatback reclining regarding torso angles for an automobile driver’s seat to preserve lumbar lordosis. METHODS:Thirty-one healthy volunteers were recruited among five body type categories. Lateral lumbar spine X-rays were obtained for the neutral sitting posture without seatback (reference), and with reclining angles of 23∘ to 33∘ by 2∘ intervals. The Cobb angles for the L1-L4, L4-S1, and L1-S1 segments were measured. RESULTS: The Cobb angle for L4-S1 was nearest to the reference (18.74 ± 1.57∘, mean ± standard error mean) at reclining angles of 29∘ and 31∘ (14.51 ± 1.41∘ and 14.47 ± 1.43∘, respectively). The Cobb angle at L4-S1 between reclining angles of 27∘(12.02 ± 1.31∘) and 29∘ (14.51 ± 1.41∘) were significantly different (p< 0.001). Tall men showed relatively preserved lordosis angles at all reclining angles. Fat men and short women demonstrated prominent loss of lordosis with excessively kyphotic L1-L4 segment. CONCLUSIONS: Reclining angles of 29∘ to 31∘ revealed to be optimal for preserving lordosis at the L4-S1 segment. Individualized healthcare-related guideline for driver’s seat adjustment setting is necessary.
Keywords: Lumbar lordosis, reclining angle, driver’s seat
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-170875
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 923-930, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]