Abstract: As the number of work sites offering back injury prevention programs continue to increase, it is unclear how these programs should be designed, conducted and evaluated. A review of the literature revealed many inconsistencies in program intent, program content, program style and program mechanics. This research survey attempted to define the characteristics of musculoskeletal low back injury prevention programs. Nine companies, nationally known for offering educationally-based low back injury prevention programs specifically targeting the worker, were identified through an Internet search, communication with established practitioners and review of advertisements in professional and business publications. These companies were contacted by telephone and asked to respond to scrip red, open-ended questions. The data presented reflect responses from representatives of each company. Both the literature and the findings of this study suggest the need for further research. There is little consensus regarding program content. The presentation styles do not seem to facilitate worker empowerment to prevent injury. Cost does not seem to reflect content, presentation style or effectiveness in preventing injuries. Intent for providing educational programming is ill-defined and poorly measured. All of these factors contribute to the lack of certainty that back injury prevention programs are effective.
Keywords: Back school, Injury prevention, Back injury, Program evaluation, Workplace intervention, Education
