Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Soklaridis, Sophie; | Cassidy, J. David; | van der Velde, Gabrielle; | Tompa, Emile | Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah;
Affiliations: The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada | Division of Health Care and Outcomes Research, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada | Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada | Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada | Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada | Divisions of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Dr. Sophie Soklaridis, The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 Russell Street, Room 4081, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 251. Tel.: +1 416 535 8501 x 30022; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background: Although return-to-work (RTW) interventions have been shown to be cost-effective, most previous economic analyses have focused on the insurer's perspective. Employers can also incur costs when supporting the RTW of their employees. Objective: To identify a key set of items for estimating the costs of RTW interventions from the employer's perspective, and to identify and value the costs and consequences of a RTW intervention. Participants: Employers with knowledge of the economic costs of RTW. Methods: A survey of 10 workplaces with RTW programs was conducted. The survey consisted of semi-structured interviews with a human resources or occupational health and safety representative from each enrolled workplace. Results: The interviews were reviewed and from them key items were identified for estimating the costs of RTW interventions from the employer's perspective. Employers identified the following costs: medical, equipment, training and education, wage replacement and productivity, and claims administration when assisting an employee's RTW. Conclusions: Even in a jurisdiction with workers' compensation insurance, employers incur costs associated with RTW programs. It is important to consider these costs, from the perspective of the employer, when studying the cost-effectiveness of RTW interventions or programs.
Keywords: Economic evaluation, work disability, qualitative, direct and indirect costs
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1415
Journal: Work, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 255-262, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]