Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Tăut, Dianaa | Pintea, Sebastiana | Roovers, Jan-Paul W.R.b | Mañanas, Miguel-Angelc | Băban, Adrianaa; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania | [b] Department of Gynaecology, Amsterdam Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | [c] Biomedical Engineering Research Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Adriana Băban, PhD, Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, 37 Republicii, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Tel./Fax: +40 4 0264 599 402; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of serious games (SGs) and their various features is inconsistent in the motor rehabilitation field, which makes evidence based development of SGs a rare practice. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of SGs in motor rehabilitation for upper limb and movement/balance and to test the potential moderating role of SGs features like feedback, activities, characters and background. METHODS: We ran a meta-analysis including 61 studies reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled trials (CTs) or case series designs in which at least one intervention for motor rehabilitation included the use of SGs as standalone or in combination. RESULTS: There was an overall moderate effect of SGs on motor indices, d = 0.59, [95% CI, 0.48, 0.71], p < 0.001. Regarding the game features, only two out of 17 moderators were statistically different in terms of effect sizes: type of activity (combination of group with individual activities had the highest effects), and realism of the scenario (fantasy scenarios had the highest effects). CONCLUSIONS: While we showed that SGs are more effective in improving motor upper limb and movement/balance functions compared to conventional rehabilitation, there were no consistent differences between various game features in their contribution to effects. Further research should systematically investigate SGs features that might have added value in improving effectiveness.
Keywords: Serious game, motor rehabilitation, meta-analysis, effectiveness, game features
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-171462
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 105-118, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]