Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Grosman-Rimon, Lizaa; b; d | Clarke, Hancec; d | Chan, Aaron K.e; f | Mills, Patricia Brancoe; f | Rathbone, Alasdair Timothy Llewelyng | Kumbhare, Dinesha; b; d; *
Affiliations: [a] Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada | [b] University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada | [c] Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada | [d] University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | [e] University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada | [f] GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada | [g] Western University, London, ON, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Dinesh Kumbhare, 550 University Avenue, Suite 7-144, Toronto, ONT, M5G 2A2 Canada. Tel.: +1 416 597 3422; E-mail:[email protected]
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. However, MPS is often under-diagnosed. The purpose of this study was to characterize practicing clinicians' perspectives of the current diagnostic criteria for MPS. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used with a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire evaluated clinicians' perspective of the current diagnostic criteria for MPS. The sample population (n= 119) consisted of 40% family physicians, 31% physical medicine (PM) and rehabilitation specialists, 11% rheumatologists, 10% emergency room (ER) physicians, and 8% anesthesiologists specializing in chronic pain. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated that participating clinicians agree that ``point tenderness'' and ``pain reproduction'' are criteria for MPS. In contrast, the clinicians do not consider ``autonomic symptoms'' as an important criterion for MPS. The anesthesiologists view ``restricted range of motion'' as a criterion for MPS more than the other groups, and they tend to consider ``referred pain'' and ``pain reproduction'' as criteria. Physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists and anesthesiologists tend to view ``local twitch response'' more as a criterion for MPS compared with the other groups. Most groups of clinicians consider ``weakness without atrophy'' as an important MPS criterion except for family physicians. It is important to note that ``poor sleep'', ``daytime fatigue'' and ``cognitive symptoms'', which are not considered as MPS symptoms, are often mistaken for MPS among practicing clinicians. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the diagnostic criteria are not well known, highlighting the need for an expert consensus to determine the importance of each criterion for MPS diagnosis.
Keywords: Myofascial pain syndrome, questionnaire, MPS diagnosis
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-150380
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 509-514, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]