Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Subtitle:
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Hagen, Marcoa; * | Lemke, Martina | Paszota, Lenaa | Lahner, Matthiasb
Affiliations: [a] Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Sport and Movement Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany | [b] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Marco Hagen, Biomechanics Laboratory, Institute of Sport and Movement Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Gladbecker Str. 182, 45141 Essen, Germany. Tel.: +49 201 183 7386; Fax: +49 201 183 7309; E-mail:[email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Measuring subtalar joint (STJ) motion is accompanied by complications due to the oblique STJ axis which results in triplanar pronation and supination. OBJECTIVE: We developed a pronator and supinator testing apparatus whose axis was aligned with Inman's STJ axis. The purpose of this study was to assess day-to-day reliability of active STJ range of motion (ROM) measurements and to compare the results with those of a rearfoot goniometer. METHODS: Active pronation, supination and total STJ ROM measurements were administered to 12 men (mean age: 23.8 years) and 12 women (mean age: 22.3 years) at two separate test sessions. Intraclass correlations (ICC), limits of agreement (LoA) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. RESULTS: Except for pronation ROM in men, the STJ goniometer revealed substantial (ICC > 0.8) reliability in all conditions. Relative MDCs and LoAs were below 15% and 10%, respectively. Significantly higher total ROM (P< 0.05) was found for women compared to men when using the STJ goniometer. The rearfoot goniometer showed high reliability (ICCs > 0.7) but underestimated STJ ROM in average of 37%. CONCLUSIONS: Both goniometric methods showed high day-to-day reliability. However, when using the rearfoot goniometer, researchers have to consider whether the level of underestimation of STJ motion is acceptable in the context of the planned investigation.
Keywords: Range of motion, subtalar joint axis, pronation, supination, intraclass correlations, limits of agreement, minimum detectable change
DOI: 10.3233/THC-150901
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 323-331, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]