Affiliations: Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Burak Gulnar, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Transverse maxillary deficiency is one of the most common skeletal anomalies. The incidence of posterior crossbite caused by maxillary deficiency is between 2.7% and 23.3%. Unilateral posterior crossbite is more common than bilateral crossbite. The most common treatment for skeletal posterior crossbite is rapid maxillary expansion (RME), in which the base of the maxillary bone is expanded by separating the midpalatal suture. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the biomechanical effects of three different RME appliances, especially the effects on the midline, and evaluates the usability of the modified asymmetric RME (ARME) appliance for treating unilateral crossbites. METHODS: Three scenarios were created with skull models using three different appliances: (1) conventional-bonded RME appliance; (2) full-cap splint RME appliance, with all teeth covered with acrylic; and (3) ARME, with all teeth on the right side and premolars and molars on the left side covered with acrylic. The finite element method was used to assess stress levels and displacements in all models after applying a 5-mm horizontal displacement to the RME screw. RESULTS: The lateral transverse movement of the first molars was greater with the conventional RME appliance than with the full-cap splint RME appliance. The lateral transverse movement of the first molar was greater on the left than on the right side with the ARME. The lateral transverse movement of the central incisors was greater with the full-cap splint RME appliance than with the conventional RME appliance. The lateral transverse movement of the central incisor was greater on the right than on the left side with the ARME. CONCLUSION: Asymmetrical RME appliance increases unilateral expansion compared to other appliances. Therefore, it should be used in cases of unilateral posterior crossbite. This appliance can also successfully treat posterior crossbite with upper midline deviation, since it corrects the shifted midline.
Keywords: Asymmetrical RME appliance, finite element method, rapid maxillary expansion
