Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jeong, Hee Seonga; b | Lee, Sae Yonga; b; c | Noh, Hyung Jund | O’Sullivan, David Michaele; 1; * | Lee, Young Rimf; 1; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea | [b] International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Seoul, Korea | [c] Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea | [d] Department of Taekwondo, Nazarene University, Cheonan, Korea | [e] Department of Sports Science, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea | [f] Institure of Haeram Education, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding authors: David Michael O’Sullivan, Department of Sports Science, Pusan National University, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, 46241, Korea. Tel.: +82 51 510 2818; Fax: +82 51 510 3745; E-mail: [email protected]. Young Rim Lee, Institute of Haeram Education, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 150, Namwon-ro, Heungeop-myeon, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26403, Korea. Tel.: +82 2 2232 2073; Fax: +82 2 2123 8375; E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] David Michael O’Sullivan and Young Rim Lee contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare and analyze the difference of impact force attenuation according to size and impact location on a Taekwondo body protector. METHODS: Body protectors sized 1 to 5, were impact tested by equipment based on the specifications in the European standard manual (EN 13277-1, 3). The impactor release heights were set to match impact energies of 3 and 15 J. The impactor was made from a 2.5 kg cylindrically cut piece of aluminum. Each body protector was impacted 10 times at the two impact energies and two locations. The differences in performance for each body protector size were compared using a two-way analysis of variance with a significance level of p< 005. The effect sizes were investigated using a partial eta squared value (η2). RESULTS: The significant mean differences between the body protector size and impact area (p< 005) and the average impact time of impact strengths 3 and 15 J were 0.0017 and 0.0012 s, respectively In addition, when an impact strength of 15 J was applied, the maximum resulting impact force exceeded 2000 N for both locations on all sizes. Furthermore, at an impact strength of 3 J size 3 significantly reduced the impact force more than the other sizes; however, size 1 showed the greatest shock absorption at an impact of 15 J. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the shock absorption of body protectors does not increase according to size; i.e., a larger body protector does not reduce the impact load more effectively. To improve safety performance, we recommend a maximum impact force of 2000 N or less for all body protectors.
Keywords: Taekwondo equipment, impact testing, injury prevention, shock absorption
DOI: 10.3233/THC-202598
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 667-675, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]