Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Qasim, Saada; b | Ramakrishnaiah, Ravikumarb | Alkheriaf, Abdulaziz Abdullahb | Zafar, Muhammad S.c; *
Affiliations: [a] Materials Science and Engineering Department, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK | [b] Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | [c] Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah Al Munawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University P.O Box 2898, Madinah Al Munawwarah 41311, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Tel.: +966 507544691; E-mail:[email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Bleaching agents are commonly used in dentistry for treating the discolored teeth. A number of biomaterials and methods are in clinical applications. OBJECTIVE: The major aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different bleaching agents on the surface roughness properties of dental resin nanocomposites and dental porcelains using various regimes. METHODS: This study was conducted using direct restorative hybrid and nanocomposite materials and dental porcelains. The specimens were treated using the bleaching gels [(Opalescence Boost 40% OP) and (Whiteness HP 35% WHP)] for 30, 45, 60 and 120 minutes respectively. Treated samples were analyzed for surface roughness properties using contact mode surface profilometry and surface topography using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data was analyzed statistically using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: There were no significant changes observed in the roughness of nanofill, nanohybrid composites and ceramic materials compared to microhybrid resin composites (p> 0.05). The SEM photomicrographs confirmed the results of the profilometer showing slight changes in the microhybrid resin composite. CONCLUSIONS: No remarkable difference was observed between the bleaching agents (Opalescence Boost and Whiteness HP Blue) for the surface roughness of tested dental materials. The bleaching agents can be used without harming the ceramic, nanofilled or nanohybrid resin restorations. However, if microhybrid or microfilled composite restorations are present in the oral cavity, bleaching may damage the surface finish and requiring replacement of restorations.
Keywords: Bleaching system, composite, dental porcelain, surface properties, SEM
DOI: 10.3233/THC-151101
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 153-161, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]