Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Papers from the Regensburg Applied Biomechanics Symposium, June 2005
Guest editors: Joachim Hammerx and Michael Nerlichy
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Helwig, P.a; * | Faust, G.b | Hindenlang, U.c | Kröplin, B.b | Eingartner, C.d
Affiliations: [a] Department Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany | [b] Institut für Statik und Dynamik der Luft- und Raumfahrtkonstruktionen, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany | [c] LASSO Ingenieurgesellschaft, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany | [d] Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany | [x] Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Laboratory for Materials Technology, University of Applied Science, Regensburg, Germany | [y] University Clinic, Department of Traumatology, Regensburg, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Department Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 761 270 2764; Fax: +49 761 270 2520; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Static analysis with finite element of a realistic femur nail bone-implant system in a typical proximal femoral fracture under physiological load bearing situations provides results for stress, displacement and strain. The question to be answered is, if simulation with the finite element analysis is able to explain biomechanically clinical observed patterns of failure. Surface-Reconstruction with CT database of a proximal femur and reconstruction with CT based density data was done. Next steps were to unite the bone structure with the Proximal Femoral Nail and to model two relevant fractures (31-A2.2 and A2.3 according AO). After modelling of geometry, isotropic material behaviour and load application numeric calculation of the femur-nail system with FE-software was performed. FE simulation mainly shows an axial dislocation of the femoral head screw with nearly no dislocation of the antirotation screw. This so-called z-effect therefore means: (1) Tilting of the proximal main fragment around the sagittal axis between the screws and (2) relative movement of both screws in the frontal plane. Relative movement of the two screws against each other could be the reason for implant failure, the so called cut out. Furthermore simulation shows different gliding of the screws explaining the so called z-telescoping. The analyzed stress patterns have to be relativized, because isotropic material behaviour of cancellous bone was assumed. Further examinations for this issue are necessary.
DOI: 10.3233/THC-2006-144-522
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 14, no. 4-5, pp. 411-419, 2006
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]