Affiliations: [a] Department of Experimental Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland | [b] Department of Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland | [c] Department of Medical Informatics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Dr. S.M. Lavelle, 204 Clinical Science Institute, NUI, Galway, Ireland. Tel.: +353 91 512 182; Fax: +353 91 525 046; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: An implant can act as a physical carcinogen. Chemicals applied to its surface can augment that. To explore if cocarcinogenesis would affect the incidence of tumour on implants, we tested several physical (asbestos, beta irradiation) and chemical (acridine orange, phorbol methyl ester, cigarette smoke tar, extract of Agaricus bisporus mushroom) carcinogens on 25 mm diameter nitrocellulose filters implanted in groups of BALB/c mice in 9 experiments. Saline was applied in 287 concurrent controls. Irradiation by 540 kBq I-125 fibrinogen on foreign bodies of surface area 20sq cm induced tumour in 6/6 pilot animals (expected 2/6) and in 25/36 animals (controls 13/29; p<0.04). The mean dose (beta and gamma) to cells within 20 μm of the filter surface was estimated to be 782 mGy. Exposures to 270kBq or less were not significantly cocarcinogenic with single implants. Radiation from the paired implants was detectible up to 80 weeks. Asbestos, however, 2.3 or 4.6 mgm on implants did not in 3 trials increase sarcoma yield significantly, but did induce mesothelial-type growths in the peritoneum. Asbestos (2.3 mg) injected without an implant provoked no tumour at the site. The chemical carcinogen acridine orange gave ambiguous results, and the others reduced tumour incidence insignificantly. The irradiation history may be germane in the human cases that arise.
