You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Data anomaly in mining statistics of India

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Chattopadhyay, Mollya; * | Lahiri, Anupamb

Affiliations: [a] Indian Statistical Institute, Economic Analysis Unit, Bangalore, India | [b] Central Statistical Organization, Kolkata, India

Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Molly Chattopadhyay, Indian Statistical Institute, Economic Analysis Unit, Bangalore, India. E-mail:[email protected]

Keywords: Mining, National Sample Survey Organisation, Director General of Mines Safety, Indian Bureau of Mines

DOI: 10.3233/SJI-160281

Journal: Statistical Journal of the IAOS, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 547-556, 2017

Published: 12 May 2017
Get PDF open access

Abstract

Comparison of official statistics on mining reveals that there are different agencies that are collecting and disseminating data on the mining sector, but there also exists data anomaly between different agencies. For the purpose of detecting data anomaly in the mining sector, official statistics provided by three government agencies are examined. The variation in the number of mining workers (both organized and unorganized sector) ranges from 2.2 million to 0.54 million to 0.52 million in 2011 between the National Sample Survey Organisation, the Director General of Mines Safety, and the Indian Bureau of Mines which clearly indicates the differences in methods for collecting and collating of official statistics.

References

[1] 

Tendulkar S. Demand for Better Statistics and Use of Data. [Internet]. PARIS21 Secretariat, OECD Development Cooperation Directorate, October (2009) [cited 2015 March 20]. http://paris21.org/sites/default/files/dasause-Tendulkar-Consortium09.pdf.

[2] 

Juran JM, , Gryna Frank M, editors. Quality Control Handbook. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; (1988) .

[3] 

Lazarevic A, , Banerjee A, , Chandola V, , Kumar V, , Srivastava J. Data mining for anomaly detection. In: Tutorial at the European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. (2008) Sep 19.

[4] 

Chandola V, , Banerjee A, , Kumar V. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR). (2009) Jul 1; 41: (3): 15. DOI. 10.1145/1541880.1541882.

[5] 

Hawkins DM. Identification of outliers. 5th ed. Netherlands: Springer: (1980) ; p. 127.

[6] 

Johnson R, , Wichern D. Applied multivariate statistical methods. 6th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. (1992) .

[7] 

Mellow W, , Sider H. Accuracy of response in labor market surveys: Evidence and implications. Journal of Labor Economics. (1983) Oct 1; 1: (4): 331-44. DOI. 10.1086/2534858.

[8] 

Bound J, , Krueger AB. The extent of measurement error in longitudinal earnings data: Do two wrongs make a right? Journal of Labor Economics. (1991) Jan 1; 9: (1): 1-24. DOI: 10. 3386/w2885.

[9] 

Bound J, , Brown C, , Duncan GJ, , Rodgers WL. Evidence on the validity of cross-sectional and longitudinal labor market data. Journal of Labor Economics. (1994) Jul 1; 12: (3): 345-68. DOI: 10.2307/2535220.

[10] 

Roemer M. Assessing the Quality of the March Current Population Survey and the Survey of Income and Program Participation Income Estimates. Unpublished paper, US Census Bureau. (2000) Jun 16; [cited 2015 Jan 30]. Available from https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/publications/assess1.pdf.

[11] 

Kornfeld R, , Bloom HS. Measuring program impacts on earnings and employment: Do unemployment insurance wage reports from employers agree with surveys of individuals? Journal of Labor Economics. (1999) Jan; 17: (1): 168-97. DOI. 10. 1086/209917.

[12] 

Hotz VJ, , Scholz JK, . Measuring employment and income for low-income populations with administrative and survey data. Studies of welfare populations: Data collection and research issues. In: Ploeg MV, , Moffit RA, , Citro CF, editors. National Research Council. Studies of welfare populations: Data collection and research issues. Washington DC: National Academies Press; (2002) ; p. 275-315.

[13] 

Schochet PZ, , Burghardt J, , McConnell S. Does job corps work? Impact findings from the national job corps study. The American economic review. (2008) Dec 1; 98: (5): 1864-86. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.5.1864.

[14] 

Sharma, Savita. Statistical System in India. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Paper submitted to the conference WB/UNESCAP/ ADB/NSO Thailand-Regional Seminar for Senior Managers on Monitoring and Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Programmes. Bangkok. (2002) .

[15] 

Agrawal A, , Kumar V. How Reliable Are India's Official Statistics? East Asia Forum. [Internet] (2012) April 6 [cited 2015 May 10] Available from http://works.bepress.com/vikas _kumar/115/.

[16] 

Bardhan P. The State of Indian Economic Statistics: Data Quantity and Quality Issues. [Mimeo on the internet]. Berkeley, CA; (2014) [cited 2016 Jan 10]. Available from http://eml. berkeley.edu/∼ webfac/bardhan/papers/EconomicStatistics. pdf.

[17] 

Himanshu A. Credibility Gap In India's Statistics. The Livemint [newspaper on the internet]. (2012) May 10 [Cited 2017 Feb 07]. Available from http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/zgIqH58iolAnAsUo9Ns1DP/A-credibility-gap-in-India8217sstatistics.html.

[18] 

Saluja MR. Industrial statistics in India: Sources, limitations and data gaps. Economic and Political Weekly. (2004) Nov; 27: : 5167-77.

[19] 

Papola TS. An assessment of labour statistics system in India. International Labour Organization Country Office, India. (2014) .

[20] 

Government of India. Ministry of Labour and Employment. Statistics of Mines in India. Vol I & II. Dhanbad: Director General of Mines Statistics; (2016) .

[21] 

Government of India. Ministry of Mines. Indian Minerals Yearbook. Nagpur: Indian Bureau of Mines; (2011) .

[22] 

International Labour Organization. International Standard Classification of Occupations. Geneva International Labour Office. (2012) .

[23] 

Government of India. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, 2011-12. Report No. 554. New Delhi: National Sample Survey Organisation; (2013) .

[24] 

National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector. Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganized Sector. New Delhi: Dolphin Printo Graphics; (2007) .

[25] 

Government of India. Annual Report. New Delhi: Ministry of Mines; (2012) .

[26] 

Chakraborty SL. Artisanal and Small-scale Mining in India. Report No. 78. [Internet]. England. International Institute for Environment and Development. (2002) . [cited 2014 Dec 20]. Available from http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G00724.pdf.

[27] 

General R. Census Commissioner (2011 A) Census Data 2011-Metadata Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, India.

[28] 

Government of India. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Unorganised Manufacturing Sector in India. 2005-06: Employment, Assets and Borrowing. Report No. 525. New Delhi: National Sample Survey Organisation; (2008) .

[29] 

Mehrotra S, , Gandhi A, , Sahoo B, , Saha P. Creating employment in the twelfth five-year plan. Economic and Political Weekly. (2012) ; 47: (19): 63-73.

[30] 

Shetty SL. Status Paper on Database Issues of the Service Sector. Economic and Political Weekly. (2007) ; 42: (37): 3723-3731.

[31] 

Dehejia R, , Panagariya A. Services Growth in India: A Look Inside the Black Box. School of International and Public Affairs. Columbia Programme on Indian Economic Policies. (2010) . Working Paper No. 2010-4. [cited 2015 Jan 7]. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:10820.

Show more