Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Warner's Randomized Response Model
Guest editors: Arijit Chaudhuri
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Dihidar, Kajal
Affiliations: Sampling and Official Statistics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: In estimating the proportion of people bearing sensitive matters like habits of tax evasion, drunken driving, etc. in a given community, it is difficult to obtain trustworthy data through direct queries. To overcome this difficulty, Warner [29] introduced randomized response techniques to estimate the proportion of people bearing such a stigmatizing or sensitive characteristic in a given community. Since then, several researchers have extended and applied this technique in various ways, for instance, Greenberg et al. [13], Horvitz et al. [16], Mukerjee [23], Ljungqvist [20], Christofides [10], Singh and Grewal [26], and many others. In many areas of the RR-related activities, the sample selection is traditionally by simple random sampling (SRS) with replacement (WR). Keeping in mind that the general large scale sample surveys usually involve the unequal probability sample selection, subsequently many researchers have enriched the RR-related literature by extending in unequal probability sampling (see Chaudhuri et al. [5], Dihidar [12], Chaudhuri and Dihidar [6]). Hanurav [14], Rao [25], Chaudhuri and Arnab [4] had compared some unequal probability sampling strategies for estimating the population mean of a quantitative variable in direct surveys under a super-population model. In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating sensitive population proportion by unequal probability sampling using the pioneering randomized response techniques due to Warner [29], Mangat and Singh [22], Christofides [9], Chaudhuri and Mukerjee's [7] forced response model, Kuk's model [18], Singh and Joarder's [27] unknown repeated trial model and compare the Horvitz-Thompson's [17] and Murthy's [24] strategies under the super population model as proposed in Lanke [19]. It is shown that under this model-cum-design based approach, Murthy's strategy performs better than Horvitz-Thompson's strategy.
Keywords: Population proportion, unequal probability sampling, super population model, model-cum-design based approach
DOI: 10.3233/MAS-150334
Journal: Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 299-307, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]