Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Rawashdeh, Mohammada; b; * | Bani Yaseen, Abdel-Basetc | McEntee, Markd | England, Andrewd | Kumar, Praveena | Saade, Charbeld
Affiliations: [a] Faculty of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE | [b] Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan | [c] Faculty of Health, School of Clinical Science, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia | [d] Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, Brookfield Health Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Dr. Mohammad Rawashdeh, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Sciences and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:To reduce radiation dose and subsequent risks, several legislative documents in different countries describe the need for Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Spinal radiography is a common and high-dose examination. Therefore, the aim of this work was to establish the DRL for Computed Tomography (CT) examinations of the spine in healthcare institutions across Jordan. METHODS:Data was retrieved from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS), which included the CT Dose Index (CTDI (vol) ) and Dose Length Product (DLP). The median radiation dose values of the dosimetric indices were calculated for each site. DRL values were defined as the 75th percentile distribution of the median CTDI (vol) and DLP values. RESULTS:Data was collected from 659 CT examinations (316 cervical spine and 343 lumbar-sacral spine). Of the participants, 68% were males, and the patients’ mean weight was 69.7 kg (minimum = 60; maximum = 80, SD = 8.9). The 75th percentile for the DLP of cervical and LS-spine CT scans in Jordan were 565.2 and 967.7 mGy.cm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:This research demonstrates a wide range of variability in CTDI (vol) and DLP values for spinal CT examinations; these variations were associated with the acquisition protocol and highlight the need to optimize radiation dose in spinal CT examinations.
Keywords: Diagnostic reference level, DRL, computed tomography, radiation dose, dose optimization
DOI: 10.3233/XST-230276
Journal: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 725-734, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]