Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Sun, Guolianga | Ding, Beichena | Yu, Gana | Chen, Lianga; * | Wang, Zhihuaa | Wang, Shaoganga | Chen, Xiaopingb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China | [b] Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Liang Chen, Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030. Tel.: +86 27 83663460; Fax: +86 27 83663454; [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Surgery is usually recommended to treat retroperitoneal tumors. However, complete surgical resections often remain challenging. OBJECTIVE:To assess the assistant role of three-dimensional (3D) imaging and printing model in retroperitoneal tumor resection, as well as compare the difference between 3D printing and computed tomography (CT) in preoperative planning and confidence building. METHODS:We admitted a patient with retroperitoneal mass (13.0×6.4×14.8 cm) adjacent to important abdominal blood vessels whose surgery was thought to be difficult. 3D printing and CT was arranged. A novel questionnaire and scoring system consisting of surgery difficulty and safety were designed to compare doctors understanding and confidence for surgery based on 3D printing and CT. Twenty-four doctors completed the scoring table based on CT and then 3D imaging, respectively. Paired t-test was applied for statistics analysis. RESULTS:Preoperative evaluation based on 3D printing indicated that the tumor could be removed completely. The operation lasted 120 minutes to successfully remove the tumor and the estimated blood loss was less than 100 ml. Scores based on 3D printing is significantly higher than CT in difficulty and safety of surgery (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the junior doctors seem to benefit more from 3D printing than the senior doctors. CONCLUSIONS:3D imaging and printing model provides greater help for preoperative planning and confidence building than using CT in resection of retroperitoneal tumor, especially for the junior doctors.
Keywords: Retroperitoneal tumor, preoperative planning, surgery, three-dimensional printing
DOI: 10.3233/XST-190636
Journal: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 471-480, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]