Abstract: Reliable biochemical results are needed for the diagnosis and
follow-up of patients with hyperammonemic disorders. Preanalytical factors
influence the results and can lead to erroneous interpretations and medical
decisions. I emphasize the need of quality assessment in the laboratory, of
adequate time of sampling for ammonia and amino acid analyses after food intake
in urea cycle disorders and on the rational estimation whether the
intra-individual difference between two sequential results of an analyte is
solely due to analytical variance or not. I present arguments for banning
capillary blood samples as well as whole blood samples collected on filter
paper for confirming or excluding a suspected diagnosis or for controlling data
in the follow-up of a disease or its therapy.
Keywords: Urea cycle disorders, preanalytical factors, sampling time, newborn screening