Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Beamon, C.J.a | Stuebe, A.M.b; c | Edwards, L.J.d | Mayer, D.C.e | Strauss, R.A.b; *
Affiliations: [a] WakeMed Physician Practices, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Raleigh, NC, USA | [b] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA | [c] Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA | [d] Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA | [e] Department of Anesthesiology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Robert Strauss, 3010 Old Clinic Building, CB# 7516. UNC School of Medicine; Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Tel.: +1 919 966 1601; Fax: +1 919 966 6377; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:Both preeclampsia and neuraxial anesthesia can alter placental perfusion, potentially affecting the neonatal status. The objective of our study is to quantify the association between type of neuraxial anesthetic and short-term neonatal morbidity among preeclamptic patients undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS:We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. Women with singleton gestations and a diagnosis of preeclampsia who underwent cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia were included in the analysis. Short-term neonatal morbidities, defined as neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, arterial cord gas pH ≤7.2 and 5-minute Apgar <7, were compared based on type of neuraxial anesthetic. RESULTS:A total of 4100 patients were included in the analysis, 1696 (41.4%) received spinal anesthesia 1848 (45.1%) received epidural anesthesia and 556 (13.5%) received a combined spinal-epidural (CSE). Antepartum and intrapartum characteristics significantly differed between the groups (p≤0.02). After adjusted analysis, spinal anesthesia was associated with reduced odds of NICU admission, compared with epidural or CSE (OR; 95% CI: 0.79; 0.63–0.98, 0.71; 0.53–0.94, respectively). Spinal anesthesia was also associated with lower odds of a 5-minute Apgar <7 compared with epidural anesthesia (OR 0.59; 95% CI; 0.43–0.83). We found no association between type of anesthesia and arterial cord pH ≤7.2. In stratiifed analysis by gestational age, no association between the type of neuraxial anesthesia and neonatal outcomes was noted among term infants, but associations persisted in preterm infants. CONCLUSIONS:Among women with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery, spinal anesthesia may be associated with reduced short-term neonatal morbidity in preterm infants, compared with epidural or CSE.
Keywords: Epidural, neuraxial anesthesia, cesarean, preeclampsia
DOI: 10.3233/NPM-180183
Journal: Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 331-337, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]