Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Dotters-Katz, S.K.a; * | Myrick, O.c | Smid, M.d | Manuck, T.A.b | Boggess, K.A.b | Goodnight, W.b
Affiliations: [a] Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA | [b] Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA | [c] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, USA | [d] Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Utah, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Sarah Dotters-Katz, MD, MMPHE Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University, DUMC 3967, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Tel.: +1 919 681 5220; Fax: +1 919 681 7861; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To measure the effect of prophylactic antibiotics given at time of previable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) on latency. METHODS:Single center, retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with previable (<23 0/7weeks) PROM. Antibiotics were given at clinician discretion. The primary outcome was latency, defined as duration of time between previable PROM and delivery. Secondary outcomes included delivery at ≥ 23weeks, infant survival, and maternal morbidity. Bivariate analysis compared maternal covariates between women who did and did not receive antibiotics. Antibiotic effect on latency was modeled using a Cox proportional hazards ratio. RESULTS:213 women with previable PROM were identified; 77 (36%) remained pregnant and thus were included in this analysis. Forty (52%) of 77 received antibiotics. Compared to women who did not receive antibiotics, those who did had PROM at a later median (IQR) estimated gestational age, EGA, (22.2weeks [20.7, 22.5] vs. 19.3weeks [18, 20.7], p < 0.01). Median (IQR) latency was not different between women who did and did not receive antibiotics (2.2 [0.7, 3.9] vs. 1.5 [0.5, 4.6] weeks, p = 0.49). More infants survived to discharge among women who received antibiotics compared to those who did not [17(43%) vs. 3(8%), p < 0.01]. When adjusted for EGA at PROM, antibiotics were associated with longer latency (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.33, 0.97], p = 0.01). Antibiotic use was not associated with differences in maternal morbidity. CONCLUSION:After adjusting for EGA at PROM, antibiotic receipt was associated with longer latency. Larger prospective studies are needed to define the utility of prophylactic antibiotics in previable PROM.
Keywords: Previable PROM, preterm premature rupture of membranes, latency, latency antibiotics
DOI: 10.3233/NPM-16165
Journal: Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 431-437, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]