Fuzzy systems in management and information science
1Introduction
Logic is a formal science that studies the principles of valid argumentation [1], and objects essential to making an argument are declarative sentences. In the classical system of logic any meaningful declarative sentence must either be true or false. Aristotle [2] postulated that the declarative sentence “There will be a sea battle tomorrow” could not be considered true or false. His reasoning can be summarized as follows: if the sentence is true at the moment of being pronounced, nothing can prevent a sea battle from taking place tomorrow. If it is false, the same will be the case, that is, there will be no way to start a sea battle tomorrow. Therefore, to accept that the sentence is either true or false at the moment it is issued would mean that our future is already determined and will be forever, and, according to Aristotle, this does not make sense since, in general, future events have the possibility of taking place or not. These types of simple declarative sentences about events that may or may not occur in the future are known as “future contingent propositions”. Łukasiewicz [3], reflecting on Aristotelian future contingents, came to the conclusion that this type of proposition should be considered “not yet determined”, creating a third possibility that differs from the “true” and “false” options. Łukasiewicz formalized this thinking in mathematical terms, giving formal origin to “three-valued logic”. Soon afterwards, Łukasiewicz himself created a formulation for other logics that allows sentences to be classified into further possibilities than that allowed by three-valued logic. Max Black [4], accepting that it is possible for an object to fulfil a property to a certain degree of truth and falsehood within the continuous interval [0,1], laid the foundations for the creation of an infinitely multi-valued system of logic. Three decades later, Zadeh [5] elaborated a linguistic context around the word “fuzzy” to designate the logical paradigm that allows each proposition to be assigned a value of truth within a continuous infinite of options. With this, Zadeh opened the doors to the new techniques used in multiple industrial applications today, such as, for example, control systems for focusing video cameras or vehicle braking [6– 8]. Zadeh’s theory spilled over into fields as diverse as medicine, geology or business management [9– 12]. Indeed, scientific works related to this theory can currently be counted in the tens of thousands [13, 14].
This special issue aims to present some of the newest advancements in this direction including contributions in economics, finance and management. The title of the special issue is “Fuzzy Systems in Management and Information Science” and presents extended versions of selected papers presented at the International Conference on Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, Economics and Management (AMSE) held in Girona (Spain) between 28 and 29 June, 2018. The conference was sponsored by the Faculty of Economics and Business of the University of Girona. About 80 people from 17 universities around the world participated at the conference.
After a careful review process, nine papers of fuzzy logic have been selected for publication in this special issue of Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems titled “Fuzzy Systems in Management and Information Science”.
The first paper, by Javier Reig-Mullor, Jose M. Brotons-Martinez, and Manuel E. Sansalvador-Selles proposes a novel approach to the bank ranking process based on the possibilistic theory. The main objective of their paper is to simplify processes, increase efficiency and improve the sensitivity of results in the bank ranking process.
The second article, by Joan Carles Ferrer-Comalat, Dolors Corominas-Coll and Salvador Linares-Mustarós, analyzes a simplified model for determining national income in which it is assumed that, for the sake of equilibrium, said value is composed of consumption and investment. The aim of this paper is to show a way of incorporating uncertainty into the analysis of the income behavior model and demonstrate how the prediction process is affected when behavior is studied globally for all the possible values of the uncertain parameters that are taken into account, each with their own degree of possibility.
In the third paper, Antonio Socias Salv
The fourth paper, by Victor G. Alfaro-García, Jos
The fifth article, written by Mayer R. Cabrera-Flores, Marta Peris-Ortiz and Alicia León-Pozo explores the relationship between knowledge, innovation, and profit-making in the craft beer industry in Baja California, Mexico. At its core, this study draws on the SECI model as a reference to highlight the different ways in which knowledge and learning combine to produce new forms of processes or products or break into new market segments.
In the sixth paper, Carles López, Salvador Linares-Mustarós and Josep Viñas present a decision method that uses the fuzzy logic tool “experton” as a basis. The aim of this research is to create an assessment tool based on expert opinions that determines criteria for local public administrations to decide whether a service should be outsourced in a given period.
The seventh work, by Ferran Herraiz Faixó, Francisco-Javier Arroyo-Cañada, Marí a Pilar López-Jurado and Ana M. Lauroba P
The eighth paper, by Carolina Nicolas, Julio Rojas-Mora and Leslier Valenzuela-Fern
In the ninth article, written by Jaime A. López-Guauque and Anna M. Gil-Lafuente, presents a general overview and a long-term comparison in fuzzy logic research published between 1965 and 2017, obtained via Web of Science. The study has provides support for the decision-making in institutions or governments and is a complementary tool to comprehensive evaluation of research and researchers.
AMSE congress communications were also related to other fields of great current interest such as Neural Networks, Probabilistic Reasoning or Decision Making. After a careful review process, fifteen papers of other related topics have been selected for publication in this special issue of Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems.
The tenth paper, by Keivan Amirbagheri, Jos
The eleventh article, by Gustavo Zurita, Jos
The twelfth article, written by Otero-Gonz
The thirteenth article, by Christian A. Cancino, Jos
The fourteenth article, by Pau Vicedo, Hermenegildo Gil and Raúl Oltra-Badenes, conducts bibliometric research into publications during the period 1999 to early 2018. The aim of this study is to help gain a better understanding of the publications covering CSF and ERP implementations all over the world.
In the fifteenth paper, M. Glòria Barberà-Marin
The sixteenth article, written by Jessica Pesantez-Narvaez and Montserrat Guillen, propose two weighting mechanisms for incorporation in a pseudo-likelihood estimation that improve the predictive capacity of rare binary responses in data collected in complex surveys. The main conclusion is that the methods proposed can improve the predictive performance of logistic regression classifiers in survey data and that this is specially so for most deciles of the predictive distribution.
The seventeenth work, by Martha Flores-Sosa, Ezequiel Avil
The eighteenth article, by Juan Carlos Salazar-Elena, Asunción López, Jos
The nineteenth paper, written by Gary Reyes-Zambrano, Laura Lanzarini, Waldo Hasperu
The twentieth article, by Maria Alejandra Pineda-Escobar and Jos
In the twenty-first work, Núria Arimany-Serrat and àngels Farreras-Noguer present an economic and financial analysis of the big wine companies in four of the sector’s leading territories: Catalonia, La Rioja, Languedoc-Roussillon and Emilia Romagna. The article first characterizes the areas under study and provides a review of the literature before going on to present the empirical study with the appropriate constrasts to explain the economic and financial health of these companies representative of the sector and especially their profitability.
The twenty-second paper, by Emilio Mauleón-M
The twenty-third, written by Augusto Villa-Monte, Laura Lanzarini, Julieta Corvi and Aurelio F. Bariviera presents a technique to extract the most representative sentences of a document taking into account by the user’s criteria. These criteria are learned using a neural network, from a minimum set of documents whose sentences have been rated by the user in terms of importance.
Finally, in the last paper, Juan C. Niebla-Zatarain and Francisco J. Pinedo-de-Anda present an overview of entrepreneurship in the family business. The purpose is to understand better the phenomenon of Entrepreneurship, their relationship, and implications related to causes and consequences derived from a family business on the first stage of their life. Scholars with interests in entrepreneurship may find relevant and pertinency information about patterns of research between universities, authors, countries, keywords, and the co-citations and co-occurrences of them.
Acknowledgments
As guest editors of this special issue, we would like to thank the editorial team of the Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. We also thank the authors of accepted and rejected papers of this special issue for their hard work and to the anonymous reviewers for spending their time reviewing papers for this special issue. Finally, we also want to acknowledge all the members of the organizing, scientific and honorary committees of the AMSE Girona 2018 International Conference for their support in the preparation of this conference that will successfully end with the publication of this special issue.
References
[1] | Tymoczko T. and Henle J. , Sweet reason: A field guide to modern logic, Springer Science & Business Media, (2004) . |
[2] | Aristóteles, De Interpretation. (In E.S. Forster, The Works of Aristotle. Trans-lated into English under the editorship of WD Ross, MA Categoriae and De Interpretation, by EM Edghill, MA; Analytica Priora, by AJ Jenkinson, MA; Analytica Posteriora, by GRG Mure, MA Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1926. Paper, 6s.; cloth, 7s. 6d. The Classical Review, 41(1), 38–39, 1927). |
[3] | Łukasiewicz J. , O logice trójwartościowej, Ruch Filozoficzny, 5: ((1920) ), 170–171. |
[4] | Black M. , Vagueness. An Exercise in Logical Analysis, Philosophy of Science 4: (4) ((1937) ), 427–455. |
[5] | Zadeh L.A. , Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control 8: ((1965) ), 338–353. |
[6] | Kaufmann A. and Gupta M.M. , Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineerin-gand Management Science, ElsevierScience Publisher, The Netherlands, 1988. |
[7] | Tanaka K. , An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic for Practical Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1997) . |
[8] | Terano T. , Asai K. and Sugeno M. , Fuzzy systems theory and its apllications, AcademicPress, Boston, (1987) . |
[9] | Barro S. and Marin R. , Fuzzy logic in medicine, Physica-Verlag, (2001) . |
[10] | Demicco R. and Klir G. , Fuzzy Logic in Geology, Academic Press, (2003) . |
[11] | Gil-Aluja J. , Fuzzy sets in the management of uncertainty (145), Springer Science & Business Media, 2004. |
[12] | Linares-Mustarós S. , Ferrer-Comalat J.C. , Corominas-Coll D. and Merigó J.M. , The ordered weighted average in the theory of expertons, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 34: (3) ((2019) ), 345–365. |
[13] | Blanco-Mesa F. , Merigó J.M. and Gil-Lafuente A.M. , Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 32: (3) ((2017) ), 2033–2050. |
[14] | Merigó J.M. , Gil-Lafuente A.M. and Yager R.R. , An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators, Applied Soft Computing 27: ((2015) ), 420–433. |