Affiliations: [a] Department of Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku, Nitra, Slovakia
| [b] Department of Translation Studies, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Stefanikova, Nitra, Slovakia
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author. Dasa Munkova, Department of Translation Studies, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Stefanikova 67, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Errors and residuals are closely related measures of the deviation. An error is a deviation of the observed value (PEMT output) from the expected value (MT output), while the residual of the observed value is the difference between the observed and predicted value of quality. We propose an exploratory data technique representing an ideal instrument to evaluate and improve machine translation (MT) systems. The main contribution consists of a rigorous technique (a statistical method), novel to the research of MT evaluation given by residual analysis to identify differences between MT output and post-edited machine translation output regarding human translation (reference). The residual analysis of the automatic metrics can help us to discover significant differences between MT and PEMT and to identify questionable issues regarding the one reference. In this study, we show the usage of residuals in MT evaluation. Using residual analysis, we identified sentences, in which significant differences were found in the scores of automatic metrics between MT output and post-edited (PE) MT output from Slovak into English.
