Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Collective intelligent information and database systems
Guest editors: Ngoc-Thanh Nguyen, Manuel Núñez and Bogdan Trawiński
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, Adrianna* | Pietranik, Marcin
Affiliations: Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Adrianna Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland. Tel.: +48713203258; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Nowadays, due to the high level of data distribution, it is frequently impossible to generate a unified representation of a variety of heterogenous data sources in a single step. Dividing the integration process into smaller subtasks and their parallelization can solve this problem. Unfortunately, it entails difficulties concerning the initial classification of data sources into groups that can be independently integrated, and serve as an input for the final integration step. The problem becomes even more complicated when not only raw data is required to be integrated, but the designed system is expected to perform more expressive integration of heterogenous knowledge representations, such as ontologies. In our previous work [10] we have proved both analytically and experimentally that such approach to the integration task can increase its effectiveness in terms of the time required to obtain the final result. In this article we intend to explore the issue of selecting initial classes of ontologies based on the novel notion of the knowledge increase. This indicator can be computed before the integration and moreover answer the question concerning whether this integration is viable. This not only simplifies the initial distribution of aforementioned subtasks, but can also be used as a stop condition during subsequent steps of the integration.
Keywords: Ontology integration, knowledge management, consensus theory
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-169116
Journal: Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1161-1172, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]