Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Tibben, Aada; * | Dondorp, Wybo J.b | de Wert, Guido M.b | de Die-Smulders, Christine E.c | Losekoot, Monieka | Bijlsma, Emilia K.a
Affiliations: [a] Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands | [b] Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands | [c] Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Aad Tibben, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, P.O Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 71 526 8033; Fax: +31 71 526 6794; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Amongst the main reasons people at risk for Huntington’s disease (HD) have for undergoing predictive genetic testing are planning a family and prevention of passing on an expanded CAG-repeat to future offspring. After having received an unfavourable test result, a couple may consider prenatal testing in the foetus or preimplantation genetic diagnostic testing (PGD) in embryos. Testing of the foetus or embryos is possible by means of direct testing of the expanded repeat. Optimal reliability in testing the foetus or embryos requires the establishment of the origin of the repeats of both parents in the foetus. For PGD the analysis is combined with or sometimes solely based on identification of the at-risk haplotype in the embryo. This policy implies that in the context of direct testing, the healthy partner’s CAG repeat lengths in the HD gene are also tested, but with the expectation that the repeat lengths of the partner are within the normal range, with the proviso that the partner’s pedigree is free of clinically confirmed HD. However, recent studies have shown that the expanded repeat has been observed more often in the general population than previously estimated. Moreover, we have unexpectedly observed an expanded repeat in the non-HD partner in four cases which had far-reaching consequences. Hence, we propose that in the context of reproductive genetic counselling, prior to a planned pregnancy, and irrespective of the outcome of the predictive test in the HD-partner, the non-HD partner should also be given the option of being tested on the expanded allele. International recommendations for predictive testing for HD should be adjusted.
Keywords: Huntington’s disease, preconceptional, prenatal genetic testing, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, CAG repeat, intermediate alleles, partner testing
DOI: 10.3233/JHD-180314
Journal: Journal of Huntington's Disease, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 71-78, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]