Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zhu, Shouxia; b; * | Chen, Jianb
Affiliations: [a] College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China | [b] Flight College, Binzhou University, Binzhou, Shandong, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Shouxi Zhu, College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Safety is the lifeline of civil aviation. With the advancement of technology, human factors have become the primary factor affecting aviation safety. Among these, human errors in air traffic control (ATC) account for a significant proportion of aviation accidents. In order to investigate human errors in ATC, this paper introduces two common human factors conceptual models – the Reason model and the HFACS model, and analyzes the specific application of the HFACS model in aviation. It is found that the HFACS model can effectively establish a classification system for human errors in ATC. Moreover, this paper combines the HFACS model with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and uses the HFACS model to establish a first and second level indicator system for human errors in ATC. We calculated the weights of each specific factor using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The results show that the most significant influencing factor in the first level indicators is organizational factors, while the most significant influencing factor in the second level indicators is Air Traffic Resource Management. Among the 13 second level indicators, the smallest weight is the controller’s violation. Based on the calculated weight results, in order to improve the safety level of ATC, the first step should be to improve the level of ATC organizational management. This is also of great significance for improving the safety level of the entire aviation system. The findings of this study suggest that the HFACS model, combined with AHP, can be an effective tool for identifying and analyzing human factors in ATC and ultimately improving the safety of the aviation industry.
Keywords: Human errors, air traffic controllers, HFACS, AHP, aviation safety
DOI: 10.3233/JCM227000
Journal: Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2867-2878, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]