Detection of Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly with a Low Educational Level Using a Reaction-Time Attention Task

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Schmidt, Guilherme J.^a | Boechat, Yolanda Eliza Moreira^{a; b} | van Duinkerken, Eelco^{a; c} | Schmidt, Juliana J.^a | Moreira, Tayssa B.^b | Nicaretta, Denise H.^a | Schmidt, Sergio L.^{a; *}

Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology, Federal University of The State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil | [b] Department of Geriatrics, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, Brazil | [c] Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Prof. Sergio L. Schmidt, R. Mariz e Barros, 775 – Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro – RJ, 20270-004, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract: Background:Scales for cognitive deterioration usually depend on education level. Objective:We aimed to study the clinical utility of a culture-free Go/No-Go task in a multi-ethnic cohort with low education level. Methods:Sixty-four participants with less than 4 years of formal education were included and divided on the basis of their Clinical-Dementia-Rate scores (CDR) into cognitively unimpaired (CDR = 0), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; CDR = 0.5), and early Alzheimer’s disease (AD, CDR = 1). All underwent a 90-s Continuous Visual Attention Test. This test consisted of a 90-s Go/No-go task with 72 (80%) targets and 18 (20%) non-targets. For each participant, reaction times and intraindividual variability of reaction times of all correct target responses, as well as the number of omission and commission errors were evaluated. Coefficient of variability was calculated for each participant by dividing the standard deviation of the reaction times by the mean reaction time. A MANCOVA was performed to examine between-group differences using age and sex as covariates. Discriminate analysis was performed to find the most reliable test-variable to discriminate the three groups. Results:Commission error, intraindividual variability of reaction time, and coefficient of variability progressively worsened with increasing CDR level. Discriminant analysis demonstrated that coefficient of variability was the best discriminant factor, followed by intraindividual variability of reaction time and commission error. Conclusion:The Go/No-Go task was able to discriminate people with MCI or early AD from controls in the setting of illiteracy.

Keywords: Attention, cognitive dysfunction, dementia, neuropsychology, reaction time

DOI: 10.3233/JAD-200881

Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 1197-1205, 2020