Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Stypa, Vanessaa; * | Haussermann, Petera | Fleiner, Tima; b | Neumann, Sandrac
Affiliations: [a] Department of Geriatric Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LVR-Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany | [b] Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany | [c] Inclusive Education of Children with Communication Needs, University Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Vanessa Stypa, LVR-Hospital Cologne, Department of Geriatric Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Wilhelm-Griesinger-Strasse 23, 51109 Cologne, Germany. Tel.: +49 221 8993387; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:The Quality of Life–Alzheimer’s Disease (QoL-AD) scale is a widely used measure of quality of life (QoL) in dementia. Although the instrument has been validated in several languages, the psychometric properties of the German self-report version have not yet been analyzed. Objective:This study examines the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the German QoL-AD self-report scale. Methods:The sample included 30 patients suffering from mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia (19 females; mean age 77.3 years; mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 19.7 points). To determine test-retest reliability, the QoL-AD self-report scale was re-administered four to seven days apart. For construct validity analysis, the Dementia Quality of Life instrument (DQoL), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), MMSE, and an adapted short form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) were used. Results:The German QoL-AD self-report scale shows an internal consistency of α= 0.79 and a test-retest reliability of r = 0.75 (p < 0.01). Regarding construct validity, there was a significant positive correlation between the total scores of the QoL-AD and DQoL (r = 0.47, p < 0.05). The analysis revealed no significant correlations with the GDS or the adapted NPI. No association could be observed between the QoL-AD and the MMSE (r = 0.01), confirming divergent validity. Conclusion:The results indicate that the German QoL-AD self-report scale is a suitable instrument for assessing QoL in patients suffering from mild to moderate dementia, thus supporting its use in clinical practice and research.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, Germany, quality of life, reliability and validity, self report
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-200400
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 581-590, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]