Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Stricker, Nikki H.a; * | Lundt, Emily S.b | Albertson, Sabrina M.b | Machulda, Mary M.a | Pudumjee, Shehroo B.a | Kremers, Walter K.b | Jack Jr., Clifford R.c | Knopman, David S.d | Petersen, Ronald C.d | Mielke, Michelle M.d; e
Affiliations: [a] Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Division of Neurocognitive Disorders, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | [b] Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | [c] Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | [d] Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | [e] Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Nikki H. Stricker, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Tel.: +1 507 284 2649; Fax: +1 507 284 4158; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:There are detectable cognitive differences in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objective:To determine whether cross-sectional performance on the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) and Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) could identify 1) CU participants with preclinical AD defined by neuroimaging biomarkers of amyloid and tau, and 2) incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia. Method:CU participants age 50+ were eligible if they had 1) amyloid (A) and tau (T) imaging within two years of their baseline CBB or 2) at least one follow-up visit. AUROC analyses assessed the ability of measures to differentiate groups. We explored the frequency of cross-sectional subtle objective cognitive impairment (sOBJ) defined as performance ≤–1 SD on CBB Learning/Working Memory Composite (Lrn/WM) or AVLT delayed recall using age-corrected normative data. Results:A+T+ (n = 33, mean age 79.5) and A+T– (n = 61, mean age 77.8) participants were older than A–T– participants (n = 146, mean age 66.3), and comparable on sex and education. Lrn/WM did not differentiate A + T+or A+T– from A–T– participants. AVLT differentiated both A+T+ and A+T– from A–T– participants; 45% of A+T+ and 25% of A+T– participants met sOBJ criteria. The follow-up cohort included 150 CU individuals who converted to MCI/dementia and 450 age, sex, and education matched controls. Lrn/WM and AVLT differentiated between stable and converter CU participants. Conclusion:Among CU participants, AVLT helped differentiate A+T+ and A+T– from A–T– participants. The CBB did not differentiate biomarker subgroups, but showed potential for predicting incident MCI/dementia. Results inform future definitions of sOBJ.
Keywords: Amyloid, Cognigram, conversion, memory, neuropsychology, one back, one card learning, sensitivity and specificity, subtle cognitive decline, tau
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-200087
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 261-274, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]