Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Torres, Stephaniea | Alexander, Angela | O’Bryant, Sidb | Medina, Luis D.a; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA | [b] Department of Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Northern Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Luis D. Medina, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Boulevard, Room 126, Houston, TX, USA. Tel.: +1 713 743 9318; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:Various factors, such as age, cardiovascular concerns, and lifestyle patterns, are associated with risk for cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Risk scores model predictive risk of developing a disease (e.g., dementia, stroke). Many of these scores have been primarily developed in largely non-Hispanic/Latino (non-H/L) White samples and little is known about their applicability in ethno-racially diverse populations. Objective:The primary aim was to examine the relationship between three established risk scores and cognitive performance. These relationships were compared across ethnic groups. Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional study with a multi-ethnic, rural-dwelling group of participants (Mage = 61.6±12.6 years, range: 40–96 years; 373F:168M; 39.7% H/L). The Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), and Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP) score were calculated for each participant. Results:All three scores were significantly associated with cognition in both H/L and non-H/L groups. In H/Ls, cognition was predicted by FRS: β= –0.08, p = 0.022; CAIDE: β= –0.08, p < 0.001; and WHICAP: β= –0.04, p < 0.001. In non-H/Ls, cognition was predicted by FRS: β= –0.11, p < 0.001; CAIDE: β= –0.14, p < 0.001; and WHICAP: β= –0.08, p < 0.001. The strength of this relationship differed between groups for FRS [t(246) = –4.61, p < 0.001] and CAIDE [t(420) = –3.20, p = 0.001], but not for WHICAP [t(384) = –1.03, p = 0.30], which already includes ethnicity in its calculation. Conclusion:These findings support the utility of these three risk scores in predicting cognition while underscoring the need to account for ethnicity. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of cardiovascular and other demographic factors in predicting cognitive outcomes.
Keywords: Aging, cognition, dementia, Hispanic Americans, minority health
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-191284
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 1049-1059, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]