Cysteine-Rich Repeat Domains 2 and 4 are Amyloid-β Binding Domains of Neurotrophin Receptor p75NTR and Potential Targets to Block Amyloid-β Neurotoxicity
Affiliations: [a]
Department of Neurology and Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Daping Hospital and Research Institute of Field Surgery, Third Military Medical University, Yuzhong district, Chongqing, China
| [b]
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences and Sansom Institute, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Correspondence:
[*]
Correspondence to: Zeng Fan, Department of Neurology and Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Daping Hospital and Research Institute of Field Surgery, Third Military Medical University, Changjiang Branch Road 10, Yuzhong district, Chongqing 400042, China. Tel.: +86 23 68757867; Fax: +86 23 68711956; E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: The p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) is an amyloid-β (Aβ) receptor that both mediates Aβ neurotoxicity and regulates Aβ production and deposition, thus playing an important role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The extracellular domain of p75NTR (p75ECD), consisting of four cysteine-rich repeat domains (CRDs), was recently reported to be an endogenous anti-Aβ scavenger to block p75NTR-mediated neuronal death and neurite degeneration signaling of Aβ and pro-neurotrophins. Identification of the specific Aβ binding domains of p75NTR is crucial for illuminating their interactions and the etiology of AD. CRDs of p75ECD were obtained by expression of recombinant plasmids or direct synthesis. Aβ aggregation inhibiting test and immunoprecipitation assay were applied to locate the specific binding domains of Aβ to p75ECD. The Aβ neurotoxicity antagonistic effects of different CRDs were examined by cytotoxicity experiments including neurite outgrowth assay, propidium iodide (PI) staining, and MTT assay. In the Aβ aggregation inhibiting test, the fluorescence intensity in the CRD2 and CRD4 treatment groups was significantly lower than that in the CRD1 and CRD3 treatment groups. Immunoprecipitation assay and western blot confirmed that Aβ could bind to CRD2 and CRD4. Besides, CRD2 and CRD4 antagonized Aβ neurotoxicity suggested by longer neurite length, less PI labelled cells, and higher cell viability than the control group. Our results indicate that CRD2 and CRD4 are Aβ binding domains of p75NTR and capable of antagonizing Aβ neurotoxicity, and therefore are potential therapeutic targets to block the interaction of Aβ and p75NTR in the pathogenesis of AD.
