Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Corvol, Alinea; c; * | Netter, Alixb | Campeon, Arnaudc; d | Somme, Dominiquea; b; c
Affiliations: [a] CHU Rennes, Rennes, France | [b] Faculté de Medecine - Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France | [c] Arène, UMR 6051, Rennes, France | [d] Ecole des hautes études en Santé publique, Rennes, France
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Aline Corvol, CHU Rennes, Arène, UMR 6051, Hôpital Pontchaillou, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex 9, France. Tel.: +33 2 99 28 41 10; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:The French National Alzheimer Plan 2008-2012 created specialized Alzheimer teams, which provide up to 15 sessions of cognitive rehabilitation in the patient’s home for 3 months. Sessions are conducted by an occupational therapist and a gerontological nursing assistant. Objectives:As the patient’s experience is one determinant of successful implementation, we explored the usefulness of these teams as viewed by the patient and his or her main caregiver. Methods:Thirteen patients and their caregiver, previously assisted by a specialized Alzheimer team, were individually given semi-structured interviews (n = 26, duration 20 to 180 minutes). Results:Our study showed that although patients and caregiver had no initial expectations, most of them appreciated the support provided by the specialized Alzheimer teams. Patients valued the “human” component, and favored interventions that improved quality of life over those intended to maintain functional capacities. Caregivers observed improved mood and behavior in patients. Those involved in sessions felt empowered by contact with a specialized Alzheimer team. We discuss how patients’ and caregivers’ feedback influenced the implementation process through comprehensive use of the five dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. Conclusion:Whereas intervention by specialized Alzheimer teams was largely accepted by health care professionals, patients, and caregivers, its effectiveness is questioned in view of its deviation from the evidence-based model. Interviews with patients and caregivers shed light on some reasons for this deviation, as what they value in the intervention differs from the functional focus of the model.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, occupational therapy, patient acceptance of health care, public health systems research, qualitative research
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170765
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 157-164, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]