Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Kallio, Eeva-Liisaa; b; * | Öhman, Hannaa; c | Kautiainen, Hannua | Hietanen, Marjab | Pitkälä, Kaisua
Affiliations: [a] Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, and Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland | [b] Clinical Neurosciences, Neuropsychology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland | [c] Hospital, Rehabilitation, and Care Services, City of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Eeva-Liisa Kallio, Clinical Neurosciences, Neuropsychology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, FI-00029 Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Tel.: +358 9 47176148; Fax: +358 9 47174088; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background: Cognitive training (CT) refers to guided cognitive exercises designed to improve specific cognitive functions, as well as enhance performance in untrained cognitive tasks. Positive effects of CT on cognitive functions in healthy elderly people and persons with mild cognitive impairment have been reported, but data regarding the effects of CT in patients with dementia is unclear. Objective: We systematically reviewed the current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to find out if CT improves or stabilizes cognition and/or everyday functioning in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Results: Altogether, 31 RCTs with CT as either the primary intervention or part of a broader cognitive or multi-component intervention were found. A positive effect was reported in 24 trials, mainly on global cognition and training-specific tasks, particularly when more intensive or more specific CT programs were used. Little evidence of improved everyday functioning was found. Conclusions: Despite some positive findings, the inaccurate definitions of CT, inadequate sample sizes, unclear randomization methods, incomplete datasets at follow-up and multiple testing may have inflated the results in many trials. Future high quality RCTs with appropriate classification and specification of cognitive interventions are necessary to confirm CT as an effective treatment option in Alzheimer’s disease.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, cognition, cognitive training, dementia, systematic review
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160810
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1349-1372, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]