Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Feeney, Joannea; b; *; 1 | Savva, George M.b; c; 1 | O’Regan, Claireb | King-Kallimanis, Bellindab | Cronin, Hilaryb | Kenny, Rose Anneb
Affiliations: [a] Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK | [b] The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, Lincoln Gate, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland | [c] School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Dr. Joanne Feeney, Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK. Tel.: +44 353 1 8963738; E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: Background: Knowing the reliability of cognitive tests, particularly those commonly used in clinical practice, is important in order to interpret the clinical significance of a change in performance or a low score on a single test. Objective: To report the intra-class correlation (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Color Trails Test (CTT) among community dwelling older adults. Methods: 130 participants aged 55 and older without severe cognitive impairment underwent two cognitive assessments between two and four months apart. Half the group changed rater between assessments and half changed time of day. Results: Mean (standard deviation) MMSE was 28.1 (2.1) at baseline and 28.4 (2.1) at repeat. Mean (SD) MoCA increased from 24.8 (3.6) to 25.2 (3.6). There was a rater effect on CTT, but not on the MMSE or MoCA. The SEM of the MMSE was 1.0, leading to an MDC (based on a 95% confidence interval) of 3 points. The SEM of the MoCA was 1.5, implying an MDC95 of 4 points. MoCA (ICC = 0.81) was more reliable than MMSE (ICC = 0.75), but all tests examined showed substantial within-patient variation. Conclusion: An individual’s score would have to change by greater than or equal to 3 points on the MMSE and 4 points on the MoCA for the rater to be confident that the change was not due to measurement error. This has important implications for epidemiologists and clinicians in dementia screening and diagnosis.
Keywords: Aging, cognition, measurement error, reliability
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160248
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1107-1114, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]