Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Matsuzono, Kosuke | Hishikawa, Nozomi | Yamashita, Toru | Ohta, Yasuyuki | Sato, Kota | Kono, Shoichiro | Deguchi, Kentaro | Morihara, Ryuta | Abe, Koji*
Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Professor Koji Abe, Department of Neuro-logy, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. Tel.: +81 86 235 7365; Fax: +81 86 235 7368; [email protected]
Abstract: Background/Objective: To examine comprehensive clinical evaluations of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patients compared with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Methods: We used eight batteries and the touch panel test to retrospectively analyze 41 FTD patients compared with 121 AD patients. Furthermore, 34 FTD and all 121 AD patients were evaluated with a frontotemporal dementia-Alzheimer’s disease index (FA index), which we developed for novel diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Frontal assessment battery, geriatric depression scale, and Abe’s behavioral and psychological symptom of dementia score were significantly worse in FTD patients than in AD patients ( ** p < 0.01 in FAB, ** p < 0.01 in the geriatric depression scale, and *** p < 0.001 in Abe’s behavioral and psychological symptom of dementia score), although there was no significant difference in the other five scores. The finding mistakes game score of the touch panel test was worse in FTD than in AD ( * p < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve of the FA index showed 91.4% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity with the FA index ≤0.6015 to discriminate FTD from AD. Conclusion: Combining clinical scores, a computerized touch panel test, and the FA index will help to provide a more accurate diagnosis of FTD in contrast to AD.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, magnetic resonance imaging, touch panel test
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150416
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 279-286, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]