Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Conejero-Goldberg, Concepciona; * | Hyde, Thomas M.b | Chen, Shufena | Herman, Mary M.c | Kleinman, Joel E.b | Davies, Petera | Goldberg, Terry E.a
Affiliations: [a] The Litwin-Zucker Research Center for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA | [b] Neuropathology Section, Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, MD, USA | [c] Neuropathology Section, GCAP, IRP, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Concepcion Conejero-Goldberg, MD, PhD, The Litwin-Zucker Research Center for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA. Tel.: +1 516 562 3495; Fax: +1 516 562 0401; [email protected]
Abstract: Transcriptional profiling of postmortem Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain tissue has yielded important insights into disease. We recently described a novel approach to understand transcriptional changes in AD designed to identify both neuro-susceptibility and intrinsic neuroprotective factors in young non-AD E4 carriers. Here we extend our work to APOE4 related AD itself. In temporal cortex (BA 21), a region known to be vulnerable to AD pathology, we identified over 1400 transcripts that differed between APOE4 controls and APOE4 carriers diagnosed with AD. Results from somatosensory cortex (BA 1/2/3), a region relatively preserved in AD differed strikingly from temporal cortex in that differences were far fewer (37 vs. 1492). We also conducted another set of contrasts involving APOE3 AD cases and APOE4 AD cases to better understand what transcriptional differences were dependent on genotype, but independent of disease status and found 6 transcripts to differ. We also conducted detailed pathway analyses in BA 1/2/3 and found significant transcriptional upregulations in pro-survival gene networks (e.g., TNF and NFkB). In summary, our results indicate that many of the molecular changes identified in the brains of patients with AD reflect the non-specific consequences of neurodegeneration, rather than causative processes. Additionally, the molecular signatures specific to somatosensory cortex may make it uniquely resistant to AD pathology and thereby could provide important leads for treatment.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, APOE, gene expression, human brain, microarray
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150345
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 969-978, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]