Affiliations: [a] Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey | [b] Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal, Bolu, Turkey
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Tugce Sener, Department of Sports Sciences, School of Physical Education and Sports, University of Cukurova, Balcalı, Adana 01330, Turkey. Tel.: +90 5305674805; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is an acute and temporary enhancement of muscular performance resulting from previous muscular contraction. Extensive research exists examining the PAP effect after a heavy resistance exercise but there is limited research examining the PAP effect after a plyometric stimulus to the pre-competition practices (e.g., warm-up) of well-trained athletes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of plyometric warm-up with different box heights on sprint and agility performance in national-level field hockey athletes at recovery time of immediately, 5 minutes and 10 minutes. METHODS: In a randomized crossover design, ten male national-level field hockey athletes performed 30-m sprint (with 10-m split) and agility test at baseline, immediately (∼ 15 sec), 5 minutes and 10 minutes after a high-intensity plyometric warm-up (HIPW), a low-intensity plyometric warm-up (LIPW) and a control trial (CT). RESULTS: Mean 10-m sprint times, 30-m sprint times and agility times were similar between trials at baseline (p> 0.05). Significant trial x time interactions (p⩽ 0.05) were observed for 10-m sprint time, 30-m sprint time and agility time. 10-m sprint times were significantly decreased after HIPW at all time-points and LIPW at immediately time-point, relative to baseline (p⩽ 0.05). HIPW 10-m sprint times were faster at all time-points and LIPW sprint time was faster at 10 minutes when compared with CT (p⩽ 0.05). Thirty-meter sprint times were significantly decreased after HIPW and LIPW at all time-points, relative to baseline (p⩽ 0.05). HIPW 30-m sprint times at all time-points and LIPW at both the 5 and 10 minute time-points were faster than CT (p⩽ 0.05). Agility times were significantly decreased after HIPW at all time-points and LIPW at both the immediately and 5 minutes time-points, relative to baseline (p⩽ 0.05). HIPW and LIPW agility times were faster than CT, at all time-points (p⩽ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both HIPW and LIPW may be effective in enhancing the pre-training or pre-competition practices in off-season for national-level field hockey athletes. However, the individualization of HIPW is highly recommended in order to maintain PAP effects for 10-m sprint times, 30-m sprint times and agility times throughout the 10 minutes when compared to LIPW.
Keywords: Post-activation potentiation, stretch-shortening cycle, depth jump, speed, team sport
