Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Fukuda, Thiago Yukioa; b | Marcondes, Freddy Berettac | dos Anjos Rabelo, Nayrad | de Vasconcelos, Rodrigo Antunesc | Junior, Claudio Cazarinie
Affiliations: [a] Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Rehabilitation Service (ISCMSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil | [b] Centro Universitário São Camilo (CUSC), São Paulo, SP, Brazil | [c] Wilson Melo Institute, Campinas, SP, Brazil | [d] Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Rehabilitation Service (ISCMSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil | [e] Vita Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Note: [] Corresponding author: Dr. Thiago Y. Fukuda, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Jr., 112; São Paulo, SP, CEP: 01221-020, Brazil. Tel.: +55 11 7733 0607; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an important tool in clinical practice to improve the recruitment of motor units. Optimal forms of NMES, as well as the optimal frequency to achieve the highest torque with the least possible discomfort are not well established. This study was designed to compare maximum electrically-induced torque (MEIT) in the quadriceps, the maximum intensity tolerated by the subject, and the level of discomfort generated by three types of stimulation. METHODS: Thirty subjects (mean age of 25.0 ± 3.0 years) participated in the study. Each subject was submitted to three currents: medium frequency (2500 Hz) modulated in low frequency (Russian Current), and two currents of low frequency (50 Hz), i.e. without an intrapulse interval (FES), and another with an intrapulse interval of 100 μs (VMS). The maximum voluntary isometric torque (MVIT) of the quadriceps was measured. The MEIT, the level of discomfort, and the maximum intensity reached were also measured while applying the three types of NMES. The order of the tests was randomized and the torque was normalized in relation to MVIT. RESULTS: The results showed no significant difference between the three types of NMES in relation to the generated torque. However, the subjects were able to tolerate a significantly higher intensity with the medium frequency current, and suffered less discomfort when compared to subjects exposed to low frequency currents. CONCLUSION: Russian Current, FES, and VMS can be used clinically in order to increase the torque of the quadriceps muscle. However, we suggest using the Russian Current in the early stages of a rehabilitation protocol because it showed better tolerance by the participants with less discomfort.
Keywords: Neuromuscular electric stimulation, arthrogenic muscle inhibition, maximal electrically induced torque, isokinetic, quadriceps muscle
DOI: 10.3233/IES-130495
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 167-173, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]