Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Chen, Qiana; b | Gao, Xiaoyingc; * | Guo, Xina | Wang, Sugea; b
Affiliations: [a] School of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China | [b] Key Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Chinese Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China | [c] Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Jiading, Shanghai, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Xiaoying Gao, Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Jiading, Shanghai, China. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Question Answering based on Tabular and Textual data is a novel task proposed in recent years in the field of QA. At present, most QA systems return answers from a single data form, such as knowledge graphs, tables, texts. However, hybrid data including structured and unstructured data is quite pervasive in real life instead of a single form. Recent research on TAT-QA mainly suffers from the higher error of extracting supporting evidences from both tabular and textual content. This paper aimed to address the problem of failure evidence extraction from more complex and realistic hybrid data. We first proposed two types of metrics to evaluate the performance of evidence extraction on hybrid data, i.e. wrong evidence ratio (WER) and missing evidence ratio (MER). Then we utilize a candidate extractor to obtain supporting evidence related to the question. Third, an origin selector is designed to determine from where the question’s answer comes. Finally, the loss of origin selector is fused to the final loss function, which can improve the evidence extraction performance. Experimental results on the TAT-QA dataset showed that our proposed model outperforms the best baseline in terms of F1, WER and MER, which proves the effectiveness of our model.
Keywords: Question answering on tabular and textual data, Wrong Evidence Ratio, Missing Evidence Ratio, multi-head attention
DOI: 10.3233/IDA-227032
Journal: Intelligent Data Analysis, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1839-1852, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]