Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Sun, Chengchenga | Wang, Zhixiaoa; b | Rui, Xiaobina; b; * | Yu, Philip S.c | Sun, Lichaod
Affiliations: [a] School of Computer Science, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China | [b] Mine Digitization Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China | [c] Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA | [d] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Xiaobin Rui, School of Computer Science, China University of Mining and Technology, No. 1 Daxue Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: In social network analysis, identifying the important nodes (key nodes) is a significant task in various applications. There are three most popular related tasks named influential node ranking, influence maximization, and network dismantling. Although these studies are different due to their own motivation, they share many similarities, which could confuse the non-domain readers and users. Moreover, few studies have explored the correlations between key nodes obtained from different tasks, hindering our further understanding of social networks. In this paper, we contribute to the field by conducting an in-depth survey of different kinds of key nodes through comparing these key nodes under our proposed framework and revealing their deep relationships. First, we clarify and formalize three existing popular studies under a uniform standard. Then we collect a group of crucial metrics and propose a fair comparison framework to analyze the features of key nodes identified by different research fields. From a large number of experiments and deep analysis on twenty real-world datasets, we not only explore correlations between key nodes derived from the three popular tasks, but also summarize insightful conclusions that explain how key nodes differ from each other and reveal their unique features for the corresponding tasks. Furthermore, we show that Shapley centrality could identify key nodes with more generality, and these nodes could also be applied to the three popular tasks simultaneously to a certain extent.
Keywords: Social network, key node, influential node ranking, influence maximization, network dismantling
DOI: 10.3233/IDA-227018
Journal: Intelligent Data Analysis, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1811-1838, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]