Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Boulkaibet, I.a | Mthembu, L.a | De Lima Neto, F.b; c; * | Marwala, T.d
Affiliations: [a] Centre For Intelligent System Modelling, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, APK Campus, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa | [b] School of Engineering (Computer Engineering Program), University of Pernambuco, Program, Brazil | [c] Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, FEBE, APK Campus, Johannesburg, South Africa | [d] Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor, University of Johannesburg, APK Campus, Johannesburg, South Africa
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: F. De Lima Neto, School of Engineering (Computer Engineering Program), University of Pernambuco, Rua Benfica, 45-Madalena, 50.720-001, Recife/PE, Brazil/Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, FEBE, APK Campus, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa. E-mail:[email protected]
Abstract: A customized version of Fish School Search (FSS) algorithm and the innovative volitive operator of FSS (which is incorporated into the regular particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm) are applied to the finite element model (FEM) updating problem. These algorithms are tested on the updating of two real structures namely; an unsymmetrical H-shaped beam and a GARTEUR SM-AG19 structure. The results thereof are compared with results of two other metaheuristic algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) on the same structures. The GA and PSO algorithms being the most popular metaheuristic algorithms used in the model updating area. It is observed that on average, the FSS and PSO algorithms produce more accurate results than the GA. In this paper we confirm that the FSSb (i.e. a customised version of the FSS algorithm, with minor modifications) and the hybrid algorithm - the Volitive PSO (i.e. the volitive operator of FSS into PSO) - are also more effective in this optimization task, producing superior results when updating the underlining Finite Element Model of both structures.
Keywords: Finite element model (FEM), fish school search (FSS), genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), volitive PSO
DOI: 10.3233/ICA-150495
Journal: Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 361-376, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]