You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

PeerJ – A case study in improving research collaboration at the journal level

Issue title: Enabling and Mapping Scientific Collaboration

Guest editors: Bonnie CarrollGuest Editor and Edrick G. CoppockGuest Editor

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Binfield, Peter

Affiliations: PeerJ, P.O. Box 614, Corte Madera, CA 94976, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Keywords: Open access, peer reviewed

DOI: 10.3233/ISU-130714

Journal: Information Services & Use, vol. 33, no. 3-4, pp. 251-255, 2013

Published: 2 November 2013
Get PDF open access

Abstract

PeerJ Inc. is the Open Access publisher of PeerJ (a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal) and PeerJ PrePrints (an un-peer-reviewed or collaboratively reviewed preprint server), both serving the biological, medical and health sciences.

The Editorial Criteria of PeerJ (the journal) are similar to those of PLOS ONE in that all submissions are judged only on their scientific and methodological soundness (not on subjective determinations of impact, or degree of advance). PeerJ's peer-review process is managed by an Editorial Board of 800 and an Advisory Board of 20 (including 5 Nobel Laureates). Editor listings by subject area are at: https://peerj.com/academic-boards/subjects/ and the Advisory Board is at: https://peerj.com/academic-boards/advisors/.

In the context of Understanding Research Collaboration, there are several unique aspects of the PeerJ set-up which will be of interest to readers of this special issue.

Show more