Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Wang, Victoriaa; * | Shepherd, Davidb | Button, Markc
Affiliations: [a] Senior Lecture on Security and Cybercrime in the Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK | [b] Senior Research Fellow in the Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK | [c] Professor in the Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Victoria Wang, Senior Lecture on Security and Cybercrime in the Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, Room 5.30, St George’s Building, 141 High Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2HY, UK. Tel.: +44 2392 843900; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: This paper explores some of the key barriers to Open Government Data (OGD) that responsible civil servants in the UK face as they try to comply with the UK-led OGD initiative. Empirically, we provide a quantitative analysis of the resources published on the government’s central OGD portal, data.gov.uk, and a unique insight into the publishing of OGD in the UK based on 22 interviews with responsible individuals at the operational level of publishing OGD. Our findings reveal that while the barriers to open government information have been substantially reduced, the barriers to open government data persist. Even the most enthusiastic responsible individuals face considerable obstacles in publishing OGD. Further, a key barrier to OGD in the UK is its impression management strategy based on its informational rather than data orientation. Due to the UK’s pioneering position in the OGD initiative, these findings are relevant to understanding and improving OGD programmes at local, national and international levels. The findings may subsequently lead to evidence-based strategies and policies.
Keywords: Open Government Data (OGD), UK government, benefit paradox, privacy, impression management
DOI: 10.3233/IP-180107
Journal: Information Polity, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 59-74, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]