Affiliations: Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo
Institute of Technology, Oookayama 2-12-1, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.
Tel./Fax: +81 3 5734 3270; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Recruiting competent faculty members and encouraging their good
practices are unquestionably important for university management. Although
faculty assessment is a basic tool for such managerial tasks, Japanese
universities had long underestimated faculty assessment. In the 1990s,
university standards changed in Japan so that internal evaluation and
publication of its results became mandatory. Since then, a series of university
reform activities have boosted universities' awareness of public accountability
and caused universities to place much value on showing easy-to-understand
results of their assessments. Accordingly, objective university assessment has
been touted, and research assessment by bibliometric indicators has been a
focus of constant attention. This paper describes the faculty assessment scheme
typically used in Japanese universities and points out its problems. It then
focuses on the use of bibliometric indicators in this assessment, discusses
problems with their use, and concludes by suggesting ways in which bibliometric
indicators could be used effectively.