Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Stamenkovic, Srdjana; b; * | Cheng, Jiea; b | Surowy, Haralda; b | Burwinkel, Barbaraa; b | Gündert, Melaniea; b
Affiliations: [a] Division of Molecular Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany | [b] Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Srdjan Stamenkovic, Division of Molecular Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive blood-based molecular markers are evaluated as promising biomarkers in malignant diseases these days. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, we investigated the potential of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration and cell-free DNA Integrity (cfDI) as blood-based diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer patients in a retrospective study cohort. METHODS: cfDNA concentration and cfDI were determined in the plasma of 37 ovarian cancer patients and 28 healthy controls, by measuring ALU and LINE1 repetitive DNA elements using quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: A high correlation was observed between the results of ALU and LINE1. The correlated co-efficiency between the values of cfDNA concentration and cfDI was 0.86 and 0.71. As for the results between cases and controls, no or just borderline significant difference was observed in cfDI after age adjustment (P= 0.40 for ALU and P= 0.05 for LINE1) while cfDNA concentration showed a significant difference between ovarian cancer patients and healthy controls groups (P= 0.03 for ALU and P= 3.00 E-03 for LINE1). cfDNA concentration of ALU and LINE1 had an AUC of 0.81 (0.70–0.91). ALU and LINE1 cfDI reached an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.46–0.73). The combination of these markers reached the best diagnostic power with an AUC of 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: cfDNA variables might be potentially diagnostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer, in combination with additional molecular markers. However, further studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic ability of cfDNA variables (cfDNA concentration and cfDI).
Keywords: Ovarian cancer, diagnostic marker, cell free DNA concentration, cell free DNA integrity
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-191018
Journal: Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 159-167, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]