Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bozkaya, Yakupa; * | Özdemir, Nuriye Yıldırıma | Sezer, Sevilayb | Köstek, Osmanc | Demirci, Nebi Serkana | Yazıcı, Ozana | Erdem, Gökmen Umuta | Eren, Tülaya | Zengin, Nurullaha
Affiliations: [a] Department of Medical Oncology, SBÜ Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey | [b] Department of Biochemistry, SBÜ Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey | [c] Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Yakup Bozkaya, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey. Tel.: +90 3125 084601; Fax: +90 3125 084914; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The potential prognostic value of survivin is variably reported depending on the gastric cancer. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the prognostic and predictive significance of serum survivin and its relation with survival and treatment response rates in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). METHODS:Serum samples were prospectively collected from 50 patients with newly diagnosed LAGC. Serum samples of 32 healthy subjects were also collected as control groups for survivin levels. Serum survivin levels were evaluated at baseline and after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LAGC patients. RESULTS: Median survivin level was 147 IU/L (range = 4.4–4936) at baseline and was 27 IU/L (range = 4.2–4737) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The difference between survivin levels of the control group (26 IU/L, range = 3.8–1430) and pre-treatment patient group was statistically significant (p< 0.001). Clinical response to mDCF regimen was classified as progressive (progressive disease) and non-progressive groups (partial response + stable disease). Baseline survivin levels were similar between patients in progressive and non-progressive groups (p= 0.55). Survivin levels were significantly reduced after chemotherapy in non-progressive group (p< 0.001). In contrast, serum survivin levels increased in a stepwise fashion from baseline to post-chemotherapy in patients with progressive disease (p= 0.06). Patients were divided into low and high survivin groups according to baseline median survivin levels. Median DFS was 12.4 and 14.6 months for low and high groups, respectively (p= 0.18). Moreover, median OS was 14.4 and 24.9 months for low and high group, respectively (p= 0.14). CONCLUSION:It can be suggested that serum survivin can be used as a predictor of response to chemotherapy- but not survival- in LAGC patients receiving neoadjuvant mDCF chemotherapy. However, large multicenter prospective studies are required to confirm these results.
Keywords: Modified DCF, locally advanced gastric cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, survivin, predictive
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-171119
Journal: Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 143-149, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]