Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zou, Yingchanga | Zhang, Xia | Chen, Xinga | Hu, Yanjieb | Ying, Kejingb | Wang, Pinga; *
Affiliations: [a] Biosensor National Special Lab, Key Lab for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China | [b] Zhejiang Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Department of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Ping Wang, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhouyiqing Building, Yuquan Campus, Zhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, China. Tel.: +86 571 87952832; Fax: +86 571 87952832; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background:Breath analysis became promising for noninvasive diagnosis of cancer with sophisticated spectrometry technology introduced. Objective:This study aimed to select volatile markers for lung cancer detection, which exclude the influences from non-malignant lung diseases. Methods:171 subjects who were divided into three groups: patients with LC, patients with PNMD and healthy controls were enrolled in our studies as training cohort. The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in their breath samples were analyzed with solid-phase micro-extraction/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (SPME-GCMS). Markers were selected by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. After that, 78 subjects with high morbidity of LC were employed as validation cohort. Their breath samples were analyzed by thermal desorption instrument/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TD-GCMS). Results:Through a series of comparisons among lung cancer patients, pulmonary non-malignant diseases patients, and healthy participants in training cohort, Nonane,5-(2-methyl-)propyl-; phenol,2,6-di-tert-butyl-,4-methyl-; dodecane,2,6,11-trimethyl-; hexadecanal and pentadecane,8-hexyl- were selected as markers for lung cancer diagnosis. Principal component analysis was employ to process data from validation cohort. As results, satisfied distinctions have been obtained with detection of these five selected markers, although the detection method is not identical with that used for training cohort. Conclusions:In conclusion, with optimization method described in this paper, breath test could be an effective method for diagnosis of lung cancer and avoid the interference of pulmonary non-malignant diseases.
Keywords: Lung cancer, volatile markers, breath test, pulmonary non-malignant disease
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-140418
Journal: Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 371-379, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]