The dilemma: Does tissue expression of cathepsin D reflect tumor malignancy? The question: Does the assay truly mirror cathepsin D mis-function in the tumor?

Article type: Review Article

Authors: Nicotra, Giuseppina^a | Castino, Roberta^a | Follo, Carlo^a | Peracchio, Claudia^a | Valente, Guido^b | Isidoro, Ciro^{a; *}

Affiliations: [a] Laboratorio di Patologia Molecolare del Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università del Piemonte Orientale “A. Avogadro”, Novara, Italy | [b] Laboratorio di Anatomia Patologica del Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università del Piemonte Orientale “A. Avogadro”, Novara, Italy

Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Ciro Isidoro, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università "A. Avogadro", Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy. Fax: +39 0321 620421; E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract: Three molecular forms of the proteolytic enzyme Cathepsin D (CD) are found in the cell: the precursor (proCD), the intermediate single-chain and the mature double-chain. ProCD, which is found in the Golgi Complex, is enzymatically inactive, while the intermediate and the mature forms, respectively found in endosomes and lysosomes, are enzymatically active. The latter are involved in autophagy and apoptosis pathways thus playing a crucial role in the control of cell and tissue homeostasis. ProCD can be secreted in the extracellular space and, by interacting with membrane receptors, can promote cell proliferation. At slightly acid pH, secreted proCD undergoes partial maturation and becomes active. In the extracellular space, CD can degrade the protein components of the matrix and free growth factors therein embedded, thus favoring tumor growth, invasion and angiogenesis. Based on the multiple tasks performed by CD inside and outside the cell, it is not irrational to hypothesize its involvement in cancer development and progression and a strict link between its tissue expression and the clinico-pathological features of the tumor. Thus, not surprisingly, as many as 519 articles are found in the database of pubmed with the keywords ‘cathepsin D, cancer and marker’. Disappointingly, however, in spite of, or because of, this large number of studies, the scientific community has not reached a general agreement on the prognostic value of CD in cancer progression. Here, we will briefly review the relevant literature and offer a possible explanation for the conflicting data.

Keywords: Lysosome, tumor marker, prognosis, metastasis, proteolysis, cell death

DOI: 10.3233/CBM-2010-0143

Journal: Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47-64, 2010