Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Formica, V.a; * | Massara, M.C.a | Portarena, I.a | Fiaschetti, V.b | Grenga, I.a | Del Vecchio Blanco, G.c | Sileri, P.d | Tosetto, L.a | Skoulidis, F.e | Pallone, F.c | Roselli, M.a
Affiliations: [a] Medical Oncology Unit, “Tor Vergata” Clinical Center, University of Rome | [b] Radiology Department, “Tor Vergata” Clinical Center, University of Rome | [c] Gastroenterology Department, “Tor Vergata” Clinical Center, University of Rome | [d] General Surgery Department, “Tor Vergata” Clinical Center, University of Rome | [e] Cancer Research-UK Clinical Research Training Fellow, University of Cambridge, UK
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Vincenzo Formica, MD, Medical Oncology Unit, “Tor Vergata” Clinical Center, University of Rome, 00133 V.le Oxford, 81, Rome, Italy. Tel.: +39 062 0908190; Fax: +39 062 0903692, E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: CEA and CA19.9 are biomarkers routinely measured for monitoring treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients, yet their predictive value during therapies containing new antineoplastic drugs (i.e. FOLFIRI/OLFOX/Bevacizumab) has not yet been investigated. Consecutive chemotherapy-naive MCRC patients treated with either standard chemotherapy-alone (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX) or chemotherapy+bevacizumab (FOLFIRI+bevacizumab) were included in the analysis. Patients had to have serial biweekly measurement of CEA and CA19.9 available for at least three months of treatment. Primary study endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Biomarker levels and type of treatment as well as major demographic and clinical factors were analyzed for their impact on PFS. Out of 243 evaluated MCRC patients, 87 had biomarkers available as per inclusion criteria. Among all evaluated factors only type of treatment (chemotherapy-alone vs chemotherapy+bevacizumab) and baseline CA19.9 (> vs < normal) were independently associated with PFS, whilst neither baseline CEA nor biomarker reduction during therapy reached statistical significance. When patients with different baseline CA19.9 levels were analysed separately, only patients with abnormal CA19.9 benefited significantly from the administration of bevacizumab. The current study demonstrated a significant predictive value of CA19.9, but not of CEA and biomarker reduction, for MCRC patients treated with new antineoplastic drugs. Moreover, only patients with abnormal baseline CA19.9 levels benefited significantly from bevacizumab.
Keywords: CEA, CA19.9, bevacizumab, metastatic colorectal cancer patients, irinotecan, oxaliplatin
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-2009-0101
Journal: Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 5, no. 4-5, pp. 167-175, 2009
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]