You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Erratum

(Link to paper DOI:10.1080/19462166.2012.682655)

In the published version of “Cognitive shortcuts in causal inference” Figure 2 is incorrect: Figure 6 was used twice, once as Figure 2, once as Figure 6. The correct Figure 2 is shown below.

Figure 2.

Normative predictions for Experiment 1. Predictions are generated assuming a base rate of 0.67 for cause features Cw and Cs. (A) Inferring an effect given the presence of its cause. (B) Inferring a cause given the presence of its effect. (C) Inferring an effect given the absence of its cause. (D) Inferring a cause given the absence of its effect.

Normative predictions for Experiment 1. Predictions are generated assuming a base rate of 0.67 for cause features Cw and Cs. (A) Inferring an effect given the presence of its cause. (B) Inferring a cause given the presence of its effect. (C) Inferring an effect given the absence of its cause. (D) Inferring a cause given the absence of its effect.

In addition, the caption of Figure 10 was incorrect. The correct caption for this figure is: Inference ratings from Experiment 3 as a function of whether the state of the alternative feature was absent, present, or unknown. (A) Inferring an effect given the presence of its cause. (B) Inferring a cause given the presence of its effect. (C) Inferring the effect feature from the alternative. (D) Inferring the alternative feature from the effect. Error bars are standard errors of the mean. p<.10. * p<.05. ** p<.01.