Affiliations: Department of Infection, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
Correspondence:
[*]
Correspondence to: Wenjie Yang, Department of Infection, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China. Tel.: +86 22 2362 6600; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: To evaluate whether genetically increased serum uric acid levels influence the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), we used genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms for uric acid as the instrumental variables, and undertook a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to estimate the effect of uric acid on the risk of AD. The MR method prevents bias due to reverse causation (e.g., uric acid changes because of AD) and minimizes bias due to confounding of both measured and unmeasured confounders. We used the summary statistics from The International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project Consortium that is the largest AD genome-wide association study of 74,046 individuals of European ethnicity including 25,580 AD cases. We further performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the assumptions of the MR method. The MR analyses did not support a causal role of genetically elevated serum uric acid on AD risk (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.93–1.12, p = 0.65). Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger regression, suggested no strong evidence of bias due to pleiotropy. In conclusion, lifelong genetically increased serum uric acid levels have no protective effect on the risk of AD.
