Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Mechanics of the Circulatory System
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bertram, C.D.; * | She, J.
Affiliations: Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 2052
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author.
Note: [1] Presented in part at the 3rd Int. Symp. Biofluid Mechanics, Munich, 16–19 July, 1994.
Abstract: Published measurements of canine arterial propagation coefficients show large disparities in pulse wave attenuation and considerable variation with frequency, suggesting both random and systematic error. Here we devise methods of assessing the likely magnitude of each measurement error source, and calculate the individual and cumulative effects on the propagation coefficients derived using three different schemes to compensate for reflections: the three-point method (3PT), the total occlusion method (OCC) and the general iterative method applied to Cox's arrangement of four transducers (GEN). Results from measurements using impulse excitation in a latex tube show that each method accumulates error in a characteristic frequency pattern. The predicted error bands for OCC are very small except at the fundamental, and clearly exclude a significant further error component. The predicted 3PT error is large at low and at high frequency, and the error bands are better predictors of actual error than in the OCC case. Transducer position error is less than anyone of the three pressure measurement errors. The predicted GEN error increases with frequency and when averaged across frequency is of magnitude intermediate between those for OCC and 3PT. Results for the OCC and GEN methods from the canine aorta in vivo generally confirm these trends, but the concentration of natural pulse wave energy at low frequencies acts to reduce low-frequency error and increase high-frequency error.
Keywords: Aorta, canine, Measurement error, Propagation coefficient
DOI: 10.3233/THC-1995-3303
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 161-184, 1995
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]