Affiliations: [a] Department of Musculoskeletal Research, Hospital of Trauma Surgery, Marktredwitz Hospital, Marktredwitz, Germany | [b] Department of Industrial Engineering and Health, Institute of Medical Engineering, Technical University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden, Weiden, Germany | [c] Department of Orthopedics Hospital of Trauma Surgery, Marktredwitz Hospital, Marktredwitz, Germany | [d] Technical University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Würzburg, Germany | [e] Hospital of Trauma Surgery, Marktredwitz Hospital, Marktredwitz, Germany
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Stefan Sesselmann, Technical University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstraße 12, 97070 Würzburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Uncemented acetabular components are widely used in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA). Modularity has numerous advantages including the ability to use supplementary screw fixation for the shell, and allow to switch from ceramic to polyethylene (PE) bearings and vice versa, and the use of lipped and face-changing liners. OBJECTIVE: Despite these advantages, a problem with modular PE liners is dissociation. This is a rare complication in modern implants. The rate of liner dissociation is reported to be very low between 0.17% and 0.8%. Typical symptoms are sudden onset of groin pain in a previously well-functioning hip joint, followed by grinding or clicking sensations during hip joint motions indicating, that the femoral head is articulating with the metal acetabular shell rather than with the PE liner. Any newly observed noise or squeaking from a THA should undergo radiographic investigation to exclude liner dissociation. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of an 88-yearold male patient who developed PE liner dissociation in a cementless THA with a Pinnacle acetabular component six years after the index operation. We recommended revision of the left hip, which was performed two days later. In the interim, the patient was advised to use a pair of crutches. During revision surgery, it was observed that the metal head made contact with the cementless cup shell without damaging it from a macroscopic standpoint. Consequently, a simple exchange of the PE liner was conducted, and a 36 mm metal head was implanted due to scratches on the original head. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis facilitates a straightforward exchange of the liner along with the head, potentially preserving the osseous integrated cup shell and stem integrity. Routine radiologic follow-up allows to distinguish between PE liner dissociation and severe PE wear.
Keywords: Polyethylene, PE, liner, dissociation, THR, THA, pinnacle cup
